Enriching and/or Profitable Phrases in Criminal Actions of Corruption Related to Criminal Decisions of Corruption
Main Article Content
Abstract
The judge decision in criminal case of corruption is practically happen by disparity case. Therefore, the problem of punishment is not only important for judge and the process of criminal justice, but also the law process entirely, especially in the term of law construction. This research is normative research so the data collecting is done through literary study and qualitative analysis. The result of this research shows that: 1) the regulation of corruption case eradication, there is no explanation include an explanation about element of enrichtment or advantageous but, there is law opinion can be parameter of “enrichment” element in corruption case namely how much the national detriment which has been abused by suspect act. 2) The implementation of enrichtment and advantageous element by judge in the future is the threat given in the form of incompetence to do in law.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
References
B. Lamani, Ravikanth and G. S. Venumadhava. (2013). “Police Corruption in India”. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, Vol. 6, No. 4, December 2013, 228234 . India: Karnatak University.
Chazawi, Adami. (2005). Hukum Pidana Materiil dan Formil Korupsi di Indonesia. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Egwemi, Victor. (2012). “Corruption And Corrupt Practices in Nigeria: An Agenda For Taming The Monster”. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa (Volume 14, No.3, 2012), ISSN: 1520-5509. Nigeria: Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University.
Muhammad, Rusli. (2013). Lembaga Pengadilan Indonesia Beserta Putusan Kontroversial. Yogakarta: UII Press.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. (1992). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Mujaj, Eurela. (2013). “Changes In The Penal Code of The Republic of Albania Concerning Corruption”. European Scientific Journal, June 2013 edition vol. 9, No.17 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 ( Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431. Albania: The European University of Tirana.
Putusan pidana kasus Korupsi Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya No. 76/Pid.sus-TPK/2021/PN.Sby.
Rasnhart, Anton. (1995). Masalah Hukum. Jakarta: Aksara Persada.
Putra Jaya, Nyoman Serikat. (2005). Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme di Indonesia. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip.
Siregar, Bismar. (1996). Rasa Keadilan. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu Offset.
Soekanto, Soerjono. (1991). Kegunaan Sosiologi Hukum Bagi Kalangan Hukum. Jakarta: Alumni.
Suseno, Sigid dan Nella Sumika Putri. (2013). Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Perkembangan dan Pembaharuan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.